Apr 23 2007

Attachment

Published by gabrielle at 12:04 am under Detachment

Why is it that the subject of detachment in the spiritual life is so generally misunderstood, avoided, or thrown out altogether from our spiritual practice as something so “inhuman” as to not be worth investigation? One of the reasons, according to Father Thomas Dubay, is that we do not understand what “attachments” are in the first place.

In, “Fire Within”, Fr. Dubay tells us that, “strong attractions to persons or things are not attachments”, and “having a feeling of pleasure in any of the five senses in connection with these persons or things is also not attachment”. So what does “attachment” mean, in its undesirable sense?  It means, writes Fr. Dubay,  “voluntary, disordered seekings”; “willed seekings of finite things in and for themselves rather than seeking them in God, their true Source and Purpose”.  Attachment is desiring or centering on something created, for its own sake.

So in our exploration of detachment, we will be looking at some of these things – disordered seekings and desires versus natural appetites, created versus Uncreated, finite versus Infinite, relative versus Absolute – and we will see why virtually every contemplative writer equates detachment with freedom.  Freedom, and love.

15 responses so far

15 Responses to “Attachment”

  1. Carolon 23 Apr 2007 at 7:32 am

    I found out a little about disordered attachment when I loved a good thing for the wrong as well as for the right reason back when my poor non-arborist neighbor trimmed my evergreens up to the waist and even took down an exquisite, full tree which wintered a lady pheasant and which I’d hoped (as I counted the minutes) now Spring and then summer a grandson many times over, now that it was big enough — all of which we had purposely and strategically planted to ease 6 months of winter, and would, tho’ no one knew how much so, ease my heart for being stuck in one (too wintry) place for so long. You’ll remember that I had just decided to tie back the curtains for the first time in years, and then wondered, baffled, why it all looked so different, so bright, so bare. To add insult to injury, he’d left the work my husband had thought he offered to do: the dead maples of which we have dozens were standing or leaning as before, as were the raspberry bushes that needed to be hacked out rather than let them take over the yard. It was even more a harm, because my neighbor is a chauvinistic sort who wouldn’t have dreamed of asking if it was alright to ruin my sanctuary. It really had nothing to do with it being our property until then.. for my rage went off the scale, and I put up a computer-made “No Trespassing” sign right where he’d see it (for which I am still ribbed by others.. because that is truly unlike me).

    How I had thanked God for those trees, esepcially having grown up and lived in so many dismal parts of downtowns..how I had longed for a weeping willow to play under, etc. It took an unanswered agonized “WHY???” phone call and quite a few months before I could forgive him. It took much longer to get over a senseless loss that wouldn’t come back. I’m not sure I’m over it, but I did decide to let love win, now that I had a clear and simple choice, because my neighbor – a single and sometimes lonely man who so loved us all in his own way and who would suffer too much loss over this, including that of our grandson calling him Uncle to both their delight – was far more important than trees, and I worked my way to that. An apology would’ve helped, but I’d had to let go of a real wound. Trees could be re-planted, but we could not grow another Uncle Neighbor, and his loss would be felt for all his life.

    Of course I am the one who ended up apologizing, which nearly dissolved him that day we finally hugged again. It was not a bad thing to which I had become attached; I love nature and consider nothing mine exclusively — I would share these yards with all.. I have told project-living folks stopping in our shade on their way home to feel free to picnic here..initially, it was a dream to create a river walk/hike for poor or inner-city kids, etc. But I’d loved my ease more than my neighbor’s feelings.

  2. gabrielleon 24 Apr 2007 at 4:08 am

    I remember you telling us about this, and actually, this very type of thing (nature, etc.) will be part of the next post. But sometimes it is difficult to tell what is disordered and what is natural, isn’t it?

    By the by, comment moderation here should be turned off by Thursday I’m told. Sorry I was tardy in putting this comment up. I wasn’t feeling too well, and went to bed right after work, and didn’t wake up till 4 a.m.!  (The time on these posts is wrong, by the way; it’s actually after 5 a.m. right now.) 

  3. Oh goshon 24 Apr 2007 at 12:28 pm

    :-) Well, I hope you’re feeling better?

    Actually, I was going to email you and ask you to not put up my comment, as in re-reading the post, I realized that’s not what Fr. Dubay or you are talking about.. this attachment of mine was not a voluntary disordered seeking. God knows, I do not seek troubles which I know will rip my heart to shreds. But for sure, I have had to battle some willed seekings.. I cling to more shins than those of Himself. But I was too heart-strung last night to do anything but go to bed and commune with son’s cat. I’d gone into Marion’s room to look for a fan, and was hit in the face with a giant concrete wall. On it was written, “She is not here. And she is never coming back.” I just wish someone hadn’t left her walker right where she left it, and the little stuffed kittens in the window, and her shoes near her chair, her doggone Easter candy half-opened, half-eaten..

    Anyway, thank you for all you do here. :-)
    I’ll try to pay attention.

    Love,
    Carol

  4. gabrielleon 25 Apr 2007 at 12:19 am

    No need to apologize – you raised some points which I think are very pertinent, and which I wanted to discuss anyway (but I think it’ll be a couple of days; I’m really not feeling too well right now, and I wish I could sleep for a week…)

    Yes, it’s very difficult when it comes time for dealing with a loved one’s personal belongings, isn’t it (even if not related). Cleaning out the room at the residence, and preparing it for someone else must be emotionally draining, but on the other hand, if you had walked in and it had already been done and there wasn’t a trace of Marion anywhere, oh, I think that would be even worse.

  5. Carolon 25 Apr 2007 at 7:06 am

    Yes.. 14 years ago, my cousin and I wiped away every trace of her father’s existence within 3 hours, and probably after only one day of cleaning and painting, the apartment housed another! That sadly boggled my mind. (I kept the cap he whistled himself home in each day for so many years, tho’. I’ll bet it still carries his head’s smell, but I don’t yet dare confirm that.)

    I’ll pray for you to feel better, Gabrielle.

  6. gabrielleon 25 Apr 2007 at 7:29 am

    Thanks Carol. (No, not something you’d want to confirm, that…) Look’s like the comment moderation is off! And I’m off, to work! Have a great day.

  7. Carolon 25 Apr 2007 at 10:21 pm

    Are you feeling better?

    I’m going to have to get “Fire Within” soon..

    I’m excited tonight.. I stumbled across two very overdue library books.. one is Merton’s “The New Man.”

    :-)

  8. gabrielleon 25 Apr 2007 at 11:17 pm

    Took a couple of extra-strength Tylenol and my eyesight’s a little fuzzy. So, a new man is overdue? ;)

  9. Carolon 26 Apr 2007 at 9:46 am

    ROFL! Oh, gosh.. how politically incorrect, that Merton.. “The New Person.” And soitanly, the new person in me is overdue. Always.

    If you have Advil (ibuprofen) there, it may help more than Tylenol. Tylenol works on me as well as sunscreen does.

    Headache? Footache? What shall we pray against for thee?

  10. Gabrielleon 27 Apr 2007 at 12:35 am

    Yes, we have Advil (even way up here in Canada!) but I don’t keep it in the house because my son’s allergic to NSAIDS. I’m feeling a bit better though (not to worry – just another flu or something…)

  11. Gabrielleon 27 Apr 2007 at 12:38 am

    You know, I’m not putting the majority of these little faces in my comments on purpose. They just keep appearing, like wild mushrooms. But they amuse me.

  12. FungiLoveron 29 Apr 2007 at 8:58 am

    “Wild Mushroom” would be a good name for an anonymous blog, wouldn’t it?
    ;-) Kidding, kidding..

    Usually when I try to put up a : ‘ – ) teardropped face (without the spaces) it comes out like this :’-) instead. These mushrooms have a mind of their own.

  13. Gabrielleon 29 Apr 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Champignon Sauvage. Ah hah! Either an anonymous blog or a new French restaurant. Let me think…

  14. OnlyHalfIzIrishon 30 Apr 2007 at 3:29 pm

    ;-) I zink mabbe we drive zee Google people crazzy wiz all zizz question. (I hope zo. Keep zem on ze toes, oui?)

  15. gabrielleon 30 Apr 2007 at 4:16 pm

    I just made a lamb stew. That’s rather Irish, isn’t it? Avec quelques champignons. Mmmmmmmmmmmmm. C’est bon. That’s it. I’m giving up the blog, and putting on my chef’s hat, full-time. Maybe people will visit me if I feed them!

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Catholic Writers Needed

Quality Handcrafted Catholic Jewelry & Gifts

Year for Priest Conference Info

103+ Free Catholic DVD's

Catholic Doctors

Largest Selection of Rosaries Online

Catholic Books & Goods

Advertise on 1,500 Catholic Blogs for $1.00!